Pancreatic & Duodenal Injury

Pancreatic & Duodenal Injury

July 7, 2009 | In: TRAUMA

27 PANCREATIC AND DUODENAL INJURY
Caesar M. Ursic M.D.


1. How common are pancreatic injuries?

Show answer
The pancreas is not commonly injured because of its protected retroperitoneal position, and thus accounts for only 8% of all penetrating and 2% of all blunt visceral injuries.


2. What other injuries are typically associated with penetrating pancreatic trauma?

Show answer
Liver injury is the most frequent concomitant injury, with a reported incidence of ≤ 50%. Other commonly associated injuries include the stomach (40%), large abdominal vessels such as the aorta and vena cava (40%), spleen (25%), kidneys (2%), and duodenum (20%).


3. How are pancreatic injuries diagnosed and staged preoperatively?

Show answer
Preoperatively, computed tomography with intravenous contrast enhancement may actually demonstrate a transected pancreas or major destruction of portions of the gland and has a high positive predictive value; however, it suffers from a low negative predictive value (i.e., it may miss even big injuries). Ultrasound does not consistently image the retroperitoneum adequately and is often hampered by overlying bowel gas. Elevated serum amylase concentrations are nonspecific for pancreatic injury and can be normal in a high proportion of patients shown subsequently to harbor significant injuries to the gland. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is also unreliable. Short of mandatory exploration, there are no universally reliable methods to assure early diagnosis of significant pancreatic injuries. Surgeons must pay particular attention to the mechanism of injury and subtle signs and symptoms of the physical examination and combine them with data obtained from imaging studies.


4. What are some of the commonly used surgical options for the treatment of pancreatic injuries?

Show answer
Most low-grade penetrating and blunt injuries to the pancreas are adequately treated by closed suction drains placed at surgery. First, the integrity of the main pancreatic duct should be evaluated, either by direct inspection or by intraoperative pancreatography. Distal duct injuries (defined as those occurring to the left of the superior mesenteric vessels) are treated with distal pancreatectomy, with or without splenectomy, and closed drainage of the pancreatic stump. Preservation of the spleen is preferable. Injuries to the proximal portion of the gland that do not involve the main duct are treated with closed suction drainage. Injury to the pancreatic duct in the head or neck of the pancreas may require resection of significant portions of distal pancreas. If more than 80% of the gland is removed, the risk of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency is high. Try to preserve distal glandular tissue by incorporating it into a Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy. With severe pancreatic head destruction, instances involving significant injuries to the duodenum and distal biliary structures may require a pancreaticoduodenectomy (i.e., Whipple procedure). Recent reports of successful nonoperative management of complete pancreatic transections in pediatric patients may shift the approach to these injuries away from resection, although the current standard of care remains surgical.

KEY POINTS: SURGICAL OPTIONS FOR PANCREATIC INJURIES

1. Low-grade injuries are treated with simple closed suction drainage at the time of celiotomy.
2. In unstable patients, debride, obtain hemostasis, and drain. Deal with the resultant fistula at a later time.
3. If ductal injury is suspected in a stable patient, visualize with ERCP or cholangiogram.
4. If ductal injury is present in the head or neck of the pancreas, ligate proximally and attempt to preserve pancreatic tissue with Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy.
5. Always place a jejunal feeding tube.


5. Is an elevated serum amylase level diagnostic of pancreatic trauma?

Show answer
No. Up to 40% of patients who have sustained significant pancreatic injury do not show elevations in their initial serum amylase level. There appears to be a slightly higher positive predictive value if the elevated amylase level is obtained more than 3 hours after the patient’s injury, although elevated amylase is common with trauma not involving the pancreas. Up to 40% of patients sustaining isolated head trauma can present with serum hyperamylasemia, which is unrelated to pancreatic injury.


6. How do blunt pancreatic injuries differ in children and adults?

Show answer
Adult pancreatic injury is usually either penetrating (e.g., stab and gunshot wounds) or high-speed blunt forces (e.g., motor vehicular crashes). Children usually present after direct blows to the epigastrium, typically from bicycle handlebars, which compress the pancreas between the anterior surface of the thoracic spine and the handlebar, often resulting in complete glandular transection.


7. What is the optimal route of nutritional supplementation after a major pancreatic injury?

Show answer
Direct feeding into the stomach is contraindicated because it stimulates pancreatic exocrine secretion and aggravates healing, potentiating secondary pancreatitis and pancreatic fistulas formation. Postpyloric enteral nutrition can be delivered safely and effectively via a feeding jejunostomy tube placed at the completion of the abdominal exploration and pancreatic repair.


8. Describe the common complications of pancreatic injuries.

Show answer
Complications are common. The two most common are pancreatic fistulas and intraabdominal abscesses. Other problems are pancreatitis, pancreatic pseudocyst, and pancreatic hemorrhage. Most patients who die after sustaining injuries to the pancreas do so as a result of late complications and not from the pancreatic injury itself.


9. What is the role of computed tomography (CT) scanning in diagnosing blunt duodenal injuries?

Show answer
Although CT is an excellent tool for visualizing solid organ injuries, CT is less useful with injuries to hollow organs such as the duodenum. Even the addition of an oral contrast agent to the study does not seem to improve the diagnostic yield. Subtle signs of duodenal injury on CT scans include periduodenal edema or fluid and retroduodenal air, which usually indicates a duodenal rupture and spillage of small amounts of intralumenal contents into the retroperitoneum.


10. What is the importance of the Kocher maneuver?

Show answer

In 1903, Kocher described what has now become a routine maneuver during the exploratory celiotomy to visualize and repair injuries to the duodenum, distal common bile duct, and pancreatic head. The avascular lateral peritoneal attachments to the duodenum are incised sharply; then the duodenal sweep is elevated and reflected medially, allowing for inspection and palpation of its posterior surface as well as of the head of the pancreas.


11. What are the four portions of the duodenum and their surgical relationships?

Show answer
The first portion of the duodenum starts at the pylorus (intraperitoneally) and passes backward (retroperitoneally) toward the gallbladder (the remainder of the duodenum is retroperitoneal). The second portion descends 7-8 cm and is anterior to the vena cava. The left border of the duodenum is attached to the head of the pancreas, at the site where the common bile and pancreatic ducts enter; it shares a common blood supply with the head of the pancreas through the pancreaticoduodenal arcades. The third portion of the duodenum turns horizontally to the left, with its cranial surface in contact with the uncinate process of the pancreas, and passes posterior to the superior mesenteric artery and vein. The fourth portion continues to the left, ascending slightly and crossing the spine anterior to the aorta, where it is fixed to the suspensory ligament of Treitz at the duodenojejunal flexure.


12. How are duodenal injuries classified?

Show answer
An organ injury scale has been adopted that allows for standardized descriptions of duodenal injuries, which extend from grade I (least severe) to grade V (most severe). The grading of duodenal injuries assists surgeons in selecting the appropriate surgical procedure for the repair or reconstruction of these frequently complex injuries. (See Table 27-1).
Table 27-1. GRADES OF PANCREATIC INJURY

Grade

Injury

Description

I

Hematoma

Involving single portion of duodenum

Laceration

Partial thickness; no perforation

II

Hematoma

Involving more than one portion

Laceration

Disruption < 50% of circumference

III

Laceration

Disruption 50-75% circumference of D2 or disruption of 50-100% of D1, D3, D4

IV

Laceration

Disruption > 75% of D2 or involving ampulla or distal common bile duct

V

Laceration

Massive disruption of duodenopancreatic complex

Vascular

Devascularization of duodenum

D1, D2, D3, and D4 refer to the portions of the duodenum (i.e., first through fourth).


13. What are the main surgical options for penetrating duodenal injuries?

Show answer
Most simple lacerations can be repaired primarily. Complex lacerations with devitalized margins or lacerations that involve > 50% of the duodenal circumference require debridement of margins and re-anastomosis of the divided ends. If tension on the suture line is anticipated because of extensive tissue loss, adjunctive techniques such as Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy or pyloric exclusion are more appropriate. Protection of a duodenal repair is best assured by a tube duodenostomy and generous external drainage. With severe duodenal injury that involves distal biliary structures and the pancreatic head, a pancreaticoduodenectomy (i.e., Whipple procedure) may be the most appropriate option.

References
WEB SITE
http://www.acs.surgery.com/abstracts/acs/acs0507.htm

BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Asensio JA, Demetriades D, Hanpeter DE, et al: Management of pancreatic injuries. Curr Probl Surg 36:325-419, 1999. Medline Similar articles
2. Ilahi O, Bochicchio GV, Scalea TM: Efficacy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of pancreatic injury in adult blunt trauma patients: A single-institutional study. Am Surg 68:704-707, 2002. Medline Similar articles
3. Ivatury RR, Nallathambi M, Gaudino J, et al: Penetrating duodenal injuries. Analysis of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 202:153-158, 1985.
4. Jobst MA, Canty TG Sr, Lynch FP: Management of pancreatic injury in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma. J Pediatr Surg 34:818-823, 1999. Medline Similar articles Full article
5. Moore EE, Cogbill T, Malangoni M, et al: Organ injury scaling II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. J Trauma 30:1427, 1990. Medline Similar articles
6. Patel SV, Spencer JA, el-Hansani S, Sheridan MB: Imaging of pancreatic trauma. Br J Radiol 71:985-990, 1998. Medline Similar articles
7. Patton J, Lyden S, Croce M, et al: Pancreatic trauma: a simplified management guideline. J Trauma 43:234-239, 1997.
8. Takishima T, Sugimoto K, Hirata M, et al: Serum amylase level on admission in the diagnosis of blunt injury to the pancreas: Its significance and limitations. Ann Surg 226:70-76, 1997. Similar articles Full article
9. Vasquez JC, Coimbra R, Hoyt DB, et al: Management of penetrating pancreatic trauma: An 11-year experience of a level-1 trauma center. Injury 32:753-759, 2001. Full article
10. Wales PW, Shuckett B, Kim PC: Long-term outcome after nonoperative management of complete traumatic pancreatic transaction in children. J Pediatr Surg 36:823-827, 2001. 1. Young PR Jr, Meredith JW, Baker CC, et al: Pancreatic injuries resulting from penetrating trauma: A multi-institution review. Am Surg 64:838-843, 1998. Medline Similar articles

Comment Form

You must be logged in to post a comment.

eXTReMe Tracker